Bystanders in Victoria do more and better CPR than Londoners

St Johns doing refresher training in CPR for bystanders in Victoria Australia

Bystanders in Victoria, Australia are twice as likely to do CPR if they see an out of hospital cardiac arrest than they were 10 years ago. This means that local people are increasingly likely to survive cardiac arrest, maintain their independence and have a good quality of life.

  • More than half (61%) of people who were witnessed to collapse by bystanders in Victoria received CPR, compared to 36% 10 years ago.
  • Patients who received CPR from bystanders in Victoria were approximately 11 times more likely to be found in a shockable rhythm, the cardiac rhythm most favourable to survival.
  • More patients first shocked by bystanders in Victoria were discharged alive from hospital (55%) than those who had to wait for first shock by ambulance paramedics (28%).
  • Patients who received CPR from bystanders in Victoria were twice as likely to be discharged alive from hospital as those who did not receive bystander CPR (12% vs 6%).

Professor Karen Smith has described how quick intervention is the key to survival.

Bystanders in Victoria take a number of steps to improve survival:

“The first step is bystanders being able to recognise that someone is in a cardiac arrest and calling [their equivalent of 999] to ask for help from the emergency medical services. Secondly, a bystander can initiate resuscitation, by performing CPR or, if available, using a public automated external defibrillator to shock (defibrillate) the patient so as to return them to a normal heart rhythm.”

Ambulance Victoria does well when compared to other international agencies.

More than one-third (35%) of Victorian patients who were seen to collapse, who had a shockable heart rhythm on arrival of help, and subsequently received resuscitation by emergency medical services survived. This increases to 38% for patients in metropolitan Melbourne.

Most Victorian survivors were discharged home (83%). Of patients with a cardiac arrest in 2014-2015, who were followed up for 12 months, 74 per cent of those working prior to their arrest had returned to work 12 months after their arrest.

This still means 26% of people previously working have not returned to work. And, unfortunately, substantial numbers of people die or do not return home after their cardiac arrest.

But, if you’re going to have an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, Victoria in Australia is a better place to do this than the UK! Bystanders in Victoria are much more likely to help you.

Surely, this is a challenge we Londoners need to rise to!?

Read more at:

http://ambulance.vic.gov.au/about-us/research/research-publications/

https://www.ambulance.vic.gov.au/more-victorians-surviving-cardiac-arrest/

Bystanders or lifesavers?

Bystanders can make a difference. Image: Urban lifesavers

If bystanders do CPR after a cardiac arrest, they can save lives.

If you’re a bystander, and you do CPR, you can double or even treble survival rates.

In the UK, there are more than 30,000 out of hospital cardiac arrests (OOHCAs) every year. But only 7-9% of people survive. In other countries, survival after an OOHCA is much higher : it’s 21% in North Holland, 20% in Seattle and 25% in Norway.

The low survival rates in England are partly because less than half of bystanders here perform life saving CPR.  This compares with almost three quarters of Norwegians intervening. Survival rates there are up to three times higher.

Every minute without CPR or defibrillation can reduce the chances of survival by around ten per cent. After ten minutes with no CPR or defibrillation, only two out of 100 victims (or less) have a chance of surviving.

Read more…

The Heart Age Test: investing in your arteries

Heart Age Tool: Image from PHE blog

The Heart Age Test works out how many years you can expect to live without a heart attack or stroke. Take 3 minutes out of your day and take the Heart Age Test. Then you can make simple changes, like doing more activity or quitting smoking, to reduce your risk — before it is too late. 

No doctor’s appointment is needed. The test is an online assessment for anyone over 30. You input some basic physical and lifestyle-related information, and get an immediate estimation of your ‘heart age’.

We should all aim for our heart age to be the same as (or lower than) our real age.

Read more…

Cardiac arrest and natural dying

Dan Beckett_talking about natural dying on BBC Radio Scotland. Cradle to Grave

Natural dying and cardiac arrests are quite different things. Dr Dan Beckett has explained how cardiac arrests may (may!) have a reversible cause, while natural dying doesn’t.

In a cardiac arrest, the heart stops first. Quite often this follows a heart attack and problems with electricity in the heart. Defibrillation may sometimes be able to restart the heart.

In a natural death, the heart tends to stop last, as part of the natural process of dying. CPR is likely to be futile because the body is dying. It may even be harmful since it leads to an undignified death, and may prolong the dying process.

Read more…

Can scenario planning help with discussions about CPR?

scenario planning and CPR

This post is about scenario planning and CPR. The new RESPECT resource purposely, and quite rightly, considers CPR in the context of other advance care planning decisions.  But even with RESPECT, I dont think worries and discussions about CPR and DNACPR orders are going away anytime soon. I’ve already suggested that scenario planning  could help here.

I want to start by making it clear that CPR can be a very good thing.

It’s definitely a very bad thing that, in the UK, only 8% of people who collapse not-in-a-hospital survive CPR.

Better ‘bystander’ CPR could and would improve this overall figure.  My posting on ‘Learn CPR from YouTube’ is for the pupils of a supplementary school in East London, and in August I will be speaking about CPR on a satellite channel aimed at the Bengali community.

Sadly, though, some people are never going to benefit from even the best CPR.

The Resuscitation Council is clear that, when “a person is dying—for example, from organ failure, frailty, or advanced cancer—and his or her heart stops as a final part of a dying process, CPR will not prevent death and may do harm.”

To be more specific, “Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is futile for in-hospital cancer patients with widespread incurable disease and poor performance status.” 

However, there are lots of people for whom the situation around CPR is less clear cut. These individuals might benefit from a discussion of the worst, usual and best possible scenarios.

Let’s start with the best case. We’re concerned here with people who have organ failure, frailty or cancer. So the very best case scenario, in medical terms, is that they get back to how they were before the CPR. Usually the CPR only happens because something has got much worse – so the ‘best case’ may well not be very good.

International meta-analyses have found that that survival after CPR is even lower for older patients, and for those who need help with activities of daily living.

For example, two large meta-analyses, found that survival to hospital discharge decreased especially when the patients were aged over 70., Of course, age can be a ‘marker’ for overall health or functional status, so van de Glind’s 2013 meta-analysis concluded that “older age alone does not seem to be a good criterion for denying patients CPR”.

What about the less good outcomes? There are some very bad scenarios after CPR for people with chronic diseases.

I’ve already shared one of these, with Debbie’s story.  Michael Stone has described another — when paramedics make decisions about individuals they have never previously even spoke to. These stories are not actually the worst case scenario, in my view. I think surviving with one’s heart beating and significant hypoxic brain damage would be even worse.

Other people may, of course, think differently — but I think that everyone making a choice for themselves should surely know of these potential scenarios.

I also think that patients and their families might want to consider another sort of scenario altogether…

When my own father died (of cancer), no-one attempted CPR. Instead, I kissed him, told him I loved him and laid down beside him.

More on more CPR

I already shared a fun, high quality video and great video game, promoting more CPR.

If you want to be more serious, the British Heart Foundation has some new CPR training videos from their Call Push Rescue programme.

Here’s the main (23 minute) video:

And here’s the 3.5 minute video on CPR for children:

The British Heart Foundation know how important more CPR is, and are offering free CPR kits to secondary schools. People in a local community can either purchase a kit or see if there is a local Heartstart scheme nearby.

Heartstart courses take around two hours. They run in the evenings and at weekends. As well as more CPR, trainees can also learn other life saving skills including what to do if someone is choking; bleeding seriously; the recovery position and the signs and the symptoms of a heart attack.

There’s a great British Heart Foundation video ‘Watch your own heart attack’ here:

And dont miss trying the live action movie game Lifesaver. Practising with this means you’ll be better able to help if you ever witness a cardiac arrest in real life. Try it out here (you’ll need to have Flashplayer). 

It takes a few moments for the game to load up: please wait while the circle whizzes round to reach 100. Then you have to Click that you have read and accepted the terms of the Lifesaver website. You don’t have to put your details in unless you want to, but you must press ‘Enter’. Then look down to click on ‘Menu’. Choose ‘Start Now’ for ‘Jake’.

This game is very like real life.

Unlike in real life, though, you can always try againEspecially if you’re as old as me and don’t immediately understand all the fine details of video gaming!

 

What’s are my chances doc? Scenario planning looks better than percentages.

scenario planning

When there’s bad medical news, many people ask: ‘What are my chances, doc?’ But often we develop blind spots for poor outcomes. Margaret Schwarze in the New England Journal of Medicine suggests scenario planning as a great way forward for this.

Dr Schwarze describes a very active 87 year priest, Father Andrew, who goes out for one if his usual drives. But wakes up in the Intensive Care Unit with a tube down his throat, and more tubes in his chest. He has multiple broken ribs and — even worse news — they’ve found cancer spreading through his chest.

The doctor looking after Father Andrew knows that, with his age, this man’s chances of dying just from his many broken ribs are 90%.

Father Andrew’s first question was when he was going to be able to drive again.

This is where doctors often part company from patients and their families.

Sometimes this is because of poor understanding of numbers by patients. The most extreme example of this that I know of was a woman who was counselled that she had a 1 in 2 chance of any children having a rare and always-fatal genetic condition. She wasn’t worried by this — explaining to the doctor (it wasn’t me) that it was just like the lottery, you either won or lost. And she’d never won anything on the lottery, despite doing it for years. So she thought it was all going to be just fine. The doctor realised this lady needed a better explanation

It’s not only patients who don’t always quite understand probabilities. My own work has underlined how many doctors don’t know actual CPR survival rates.

Father Andrew thought he had a 10% chance of getting back to normal. “He’s a fighter”, his sister told the doctors. But all the fighting in the world wasn’t going to get Andrew back to normal.

Instead of percentages,  another approach would be to use scenario planning to think in terms of the possible outcomes. Thinking like this can “help patients look beyond isolated risks to imagine a new potential reality”.

The best case scenario for Father Andrew would mean that he might leave the hospital. Before then, he “would need ventilator support for many days. He would have pain and be unable to talk to his family. He might gain enough strength to be extubated, but given his age and pulmonary function, he would never regain the independence he has enjoyed.” After his discharge, of course, his cancer would continue to grow. With it affecting his breathing, he would “need substantial nursing care; he would never drive again, and he would die.”

The most likely case, was that “he would improve somewhat, but would ultimately struggle to breathe on his own and would die within days.”

The worst case scenario includes lots of fruitless interventions, more pain, less dignity and no communication.

Father Andrew chose to be extubated and talk to his family. Communication with others was, after all, his life’s work. He “died later that day, surrounded by family.”

I think the scenario planning approach could really help in discussions about CPR and DNACPR orders.

Learn CPR from YouTube

Did you know that, in the UK, only 8% of the people who are resuscitated outside a hospital survive to go home? If we all learnt CPR from YouTube, survival rates would improve.

YOU could at least DOUBLE  the person’s chances of survival if you follow the simple instructions here. Outside hospital, most cardiac arrests happen at home, so it is likely to be a member of your family or a friend that you help.

When someone has a cardiac arrest, there’s no time to wait.

Someone has to do something straight away.

Outside a hospital that means whoever gets there first. Whether or not they – that’s YOU, actually! – have had any training with the necessary CPR.

CPR is nothing like it is on the TV. But it’s not as hard as it looks. Even if you’ve not been to a formal training session, you can learn CPR from YouTube. Vinnie Jones has already made a video with a ‘CPR lesson you’ll never forget’ . But the CPR on YouTube video below is even better. Mini Vinnie demonstrates that hands-only CPR is – literally – childsplay:

CPR is all about Call, Push, Rescue:

Call 999 for help.

Push hard and fast on the centre of the chest 30 times.

Give two Rescue breaths, if you are able and willing. It’s still worthwhile to do hands only CPR. So if you don’t want to, just don’t do the Rescue breaths.

And keep going.

Remember, you’ll at least DOUBLE the person’s chances of survival if you keep going with CPR until the ambulance arrives.

In England, we only do this so-called “bystander CPR” for around 40% of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. In Norway, bystanders do CPR nearly twice as often, and their survival rates are MUCH better than in the UK.

We – you and me – could do much better!

As well as calling 999, the other thing to Call for, if you’re in a public place, is a defibrillator. Some hearts are what is described as ‘shockable’. In these cases, then for every MINUTE defibrillation is delayed, the chances of survival fall by around 10%.

So don’t wait for the Ambulance to get there. If you’re in a station or a shopping centre, get someone to ask for their defibrillator whilst you’re doing CPR.

Here’s what to look for in the UK:

This is what defibrillators look like in places in the UK. Image: Mirror newspaper

Most defibrillators ‘talk’ to you to tell you what to do when you open them up. If not, there are always easy instructions inside all defibrillator boxes.

To remind you exactly what to do for hands-only CPR, and to check that you are pushing hard enough and fast enough, you can get the free British Heart Foundation PocketCPR app here.

But if you really want to try doing CPR, the nearest you’re going to get to real life without it actually happening is the crisis simulator Lifesaver.

Practicing what to do in this live action movie game means you’ll be better able to help if you ever witness a cardiac arrest in real life. Try it out here (you’ll need to have Flashplayer). 

It takes a few moments for the game to load up: please wait while the circle whizzes round to reach 100. Then you have to Click that you have read and accepted the terms of the Lifesaver website. You don’t have to put your details in unless you want to, but you must press ‘Enter’. Then look down to click on ‘Menu’. Choose ‘Start Now’ for ‘Jake’.

This game is very like real life.

Pay attention! You’re about to try to restart a heart!

Although this video game is very realistic then, unlike in real life, you can always try again. Especially if you’re as old as me and don’t immediately understand all the fine details of video gaming!

Please let me know how it went!

I’m at caroline.mawer@gmail.com

Bad news? Focus on the person

Heres an example of someone who knows how to focus on the person. Social worker with a SAGE client. Image from bwhheartandscience

If we focus on the person, rather than their diagnosis or any specific intervention, this can turn the idea of ‘bad news conversations’ (almost!) upside down.

When so many doctors find talking about bad news so difficult, just saying that we need to be more open doesn’t really help. Especially when many patients and their families simply collude in avoiding talking about bad news.

There’s a big worry that being explicit ‘removes hope’ and so just upsets patient and their families.

So Ariadne Labs asked “Why don’t these [bad news] conversations happen?” and “What can we do to make sure they do?” They identified the things that get in the way. Based on this, they created a systematic, multistep intervention, called SAGE. This even includes practice for the doctors with trained actors standing in as patients.

Usually doctors ask about treatment options: Do you want this?  Or do you want that? Ariadne’s very different approach has a strong focus on the person. It starts with asking patients if it’s OK to ask. This is like the ‘I’ for ‘invitation’ in the SPIKES model I already discussed.

It underlines that while we can hope for the best, we should prepare for the worst.

And is also clear that (because they do all this early!) no decisions are necessary today. The specific questions start with asking and listening. Always, the key is to focus on the person. They ask:

What is your understanding now of where you are with your illness?

Of course, anyone using this method should look through the whole thing. But I wanted to pick out some great questions that follow on from here (even if they are perhaps in American med-speak). With each of them there is a focus on the person:

  • If your health situation worsens, what are your most important goals?

  • What are your biggest fears and worries about the future with your health?

  • What abilities are so critical to your life that you can’t imagine living without them?

  • If you become sicker, how much are you willing to go through for the possibility of gaining more time?

Reaching an understanding about these sorts of things helps doctors to properly understand what patients might want in the uncertain, ever-shifting times ahead.

SAGE launched their program in primary care, because they “guessed that doctors’ long-term and trusting relationships with their patients would ease these conversations.” Following the training, almost three quarters of more than 200 primary care patients identified with serious and complex illness had useful and detailed conversations.

But Ariadne discovered early on that primary care missed out on a lot of people. A review of more than 350 deaths found that half of the most complex of these had been “cycling between the hospital, nursing homes and other care facilities” rather than being seen in primary care. So they decided to look at hospital conversations as well. They recognised that they needed to design a program specifically for inpatient clinicians – the doctors and nurses who manage patients once they arrive at the hospital.

The challenge was that “traditionally, end-of-life conversations within hospitals focus on medical procedures rather than more nuanced discussions about the patients’ goals and wishes.”

Hospital staff needed help “not only in identifying patients with whom they should have these challenging conversations, but in the specifics of the conversation itself. They also needed support to ensure rapid follow up with patients, families and primary care teams after the patient left the hospital.” The SAGE Programme arranged for social workers to share the information from the hospital discussions with primary and community care staff. And to act as a steady contact after discharge. This all allowed the clinicians to focus on the person.

A pilot study found that 100% of patient in the SAGE programme had detailed and clearly documented conversations about goals and priorities compared with just 40% of patients in the usual care group. Other positive data has been presented at scientific conferences.

Perhaps most importantly “having the conversation lowered patients’ anxiety, and patients reported that their hopefulness remained steady, while their sense of control over medical decisions increased.”

The fuller report of this work includes a story about “a patient we’ll call Evelyn”. This elegant 81-year-old lady had advanced dementia, so had been in hospital four times in eight months. “Before Evelyn started with the SAGE program, her devoted daughter had advocated for any treatment that might keep her mother alive longer. After careful discussions between Evelyn’s clinicians and the family that focused on Evelyn’s personality, sources of enjoyment, and known life priorities, as well as the trajectory of her illness, the family shifted the goals of her care from quantity of life to quality. Evelyn was content and comfortable in her final months, spending time with family, listening to music, and eating foods she enjoyed, rather than returning to the unfamiliar and restrictive environment of the hospital. Her daughter later reflected on the pivotal role of these discussions in helping to plan better for what lay ahead – in order to honour the things that were most important to Evelyn in her final months.”

Death doulas in the USA

Emily Dickinson poem: Because I could not stop for Death, He kindly stopped for me. Image from dead maidens.com

Death doulas help people who are facing the end of life alone. Even for people who have family, often no-one wants to talk about death — and that can be very isolating and lonely.

There are increasing numbers of death doulas in the UK, but I thought I would share some of a recent article about death doulas in the USA.

The word “Doula” has often been used to describe those volunteers who offer support and comfort to people during pregnancy. More recently, death doulas — women and men — help those who are dying. The word derives from the Greek for a female servant

Death doulas are volunteers who aren’t medically trained ― they’re there to offer support, to listen, and to develop a relationship with the person they’ve been matched with that goes beyond his or her illness. It’s not so much about being there at the moment of death — though of course that can happen. Instead, it’s more about being present during the final stage of a person’s life and getting to know them on a deeper level than just their illness.

Anybody who has a calling and an open heart can do the work of a death doula.

Unlike most medical professionals, and some birth doulas, there is no national or international body that oversees certification requirements or scope of practice for death doulas.

In New York, The Doula Program to Accompany and Comfort, has about 60 active volunteers, working with people of any age who have been told they are going to die from their illness and who are facing the end of their life alone.

Doulas from the (American) International End of Life Doula Association (INELDA), are also trained to help the family of the dying person plan for and process their death. Since now we’re not used to seeing death, dying can lead to a lot of anxiety. INELDA doulas can help the family put together memory books, videos, audio recordings, and collages ― things to pass down after a person’s death.

Increasing numbers of people are applying for doula training both in the USA and in the UK. Janie Rakow, president of INELDA explained that, although it may seem curious that so many people want to be a companion for those individuals who are dying, it’s not at all morbid. “People always ask how we can do this work. They think it’s depressing,” she said,  “But when you do this work it is the opposite of depressing. It’s profound work.

Deanna Cochran, a hospice nurse and the founder of Quality of Life Care, which trains and certifies death doulas, explains that she isn’t aiming to create another health care profession but to empower individuals everywhere to emotionally support their loved ones as they die.

“I want to get the message out that you can do this too. You can learn to take care of your own dying and dead,” she said.

Cochran encourages death doulas to be advocates for their clients, helping them navigate the medical system and ask their doctors what options might available to them, including palliative care.

“We [all] need to accept that we’re not going to live forever,” Cochran said. “We’re going to die. We just don’t know when, and we don’t know how. Empowerment comes in planning for it and letting your family know what you want.”

But INELDA’s vice president, Jeri Glatter says there’s another way to look at it.

“I see death as an opportunity for change and growth,” he said. “You see awakenings, forgiveness; you see new bonds made and old wounds healed, which I believe send the dying on their final transition peacefully and bring new opportunities for the people who remain.”